Derek, of course the architecture looks like the one of Win32Lib, mainly because Win32Lib's architecture is a good and logical one. The changes will be in the organization, the (attempt for a) solid and extensible component framework, and the fact that the standard controls will be more separated from the core. About the logo issue: I don't think it'll get me into trouble. It does resemble the Windows-logo a bit. But I don't use it to compete with Microsoft, or to make fun of Microsoft. Many parodies include a logo that resembles the Windows-logo even closer. The idea was to unite the Windows-flag with an E.
2 comments:
Hi Tommy,
your architecure is solid. Its exactly the same
as Win32lib ;-)
Your logo is going to bring Microsoft down on you
like a tonne of bricks. You are treading on thin
ice with that one.
--
Derek Parnell
Derek, of course the architecture looks like the one of Win32Lib, mainly because Win32Lib's architecture is a good and logical one. The changes will be in the organization, the (attempt for a) solid and extensible component framework, and the fact that the standard controls will be more separated from the core.
About the logo issue: I don't think it'll get me into trouble. It does resemble the Windows-logo a bit. But I don't use it to compete with Microsoft, or to make fun of Microsoft. Many parodies include a logo that resembles the Windows-logo even closer.
The idea was to unite the Windows-flag with an E.
Post a Comment